One Health Antimicrobial Resistance Research Network Funding Opportunity: Questions and Answers

  • Is there duplication between the AMR Network Grant and the Health Research Training Platform (HRTP) funding opportunity? Are they mutually exclusive or inclusive?

    The AMR Network Grant and the HRTP are designed to be complementary. Both support training and capacity building for AMR researchers, and many people may be involved in both initiatives. The intent is to promote collaboration, leverage existing strengths, and avoid unnecessary duplication while advancing national training and capacity building efforts.

  • Would a team be penalized for proposing training and capacity building activities similar to those developed through previous work or existing networks?

    Duplication of activities already funded through the HRTP would not be well received by the peer review committee. However, applicants are encouraged to build on, complement and expand existing training and capacity building efforts where appropriate. Proposals that demonstrate synergies with the HRTP and clearly articulate added value for Canadians are welcome.

  • What is the best way to connect with others in the AMR community to coordinate a proposal?

    The Partner Linkage Tool is the recommended mechanism for connecting with the broader AMR community. Applicants may also contact the CIHR Contact Centre for assistance or additional guidance.

  • Can international partners be included in a team applying for this funding opportunity?

    Yes. Including international partners is encouraged, as it helps ensure that the AMR Network is aligned with global efforts and benefits from broader international collaboration.

  • Can academic research staff or managers serve as champions within the AMR Network Team, or is this role limited to faculty members?

    The champion role is defined by function and rationale, not by job title. If the proposal provides a strong justification for why a particular individual, regardless of title, is well-suited to serve as a champion, they will be considered eligible for that role.

  • How is "North" defined for this funding opportunity, particularly regarding Northern Ontario, Québec, and the territories? What actions can help reduce gaps in scientific support and infrastructure?

    For this funding opportunity, the North includes the territories as well as the northern regions of several provinces, based on the Government of Canada's official definition. Meaningful engagement with communities in the North, rather than symbolic participation, is essential. Building genuine relationships and understanding local needs are critical steps in reducing disparities in scientific support and infrastructure between northern and southern regions of Canada.

Date modified: